Understanding what is the difference between medical malpractice and negligence is crucial for anyone considering legal action after being harmed by another’s actions. While both concepts involve a breach of duty that causes harm, they are not interchangeable in a legal claim. Medical malpractice is a specific type of negligence in the healthcare industry, where professionals are held to a higher standard of care. Knowing the nuances between these two can help you determine the most appropriate course of action.
Defining Negligence
Negligence occurs when someone fails to act with the care that a reasonable person would use in a similar situation, and this failure leads to someone getting hurt. It’s not just about making a mistake; it’s about not taking the proper precautions that could have prevented harm. For example, if a driver runs a red light and causes an accident, that’s negligence.
Four key elements are required to prove negligence:
- Duty of care—duty means the person has a responsibility to act in a way that wouldn’t cause harm to you;
- Breach of duty—the person didn’t live up to that responsibility;
- Causation—the breach of duty directly caused harm or injury; and
- Damages—the injured person suffered losses, like medical bills or lost wages, because of the incident.
Understanding these elements is essential because they form the foundation of most negligence cases. Recovering compensation in a negligence-based claim is impossible without proving all four elements.
Understanding Medical Malpractice
Medical malpractice is a specific kind of negligence when a healthcare provider fails to meet the standard of care expected in their medical field. This breach in the standard of care leads to patient harm. Unlike general negligence, medical malpractice involves professionals like doctors, nurses, and other healthcare workers who are held to a higher standard because of their specialized training and responsibilities.
The standard of care is the level of care a reasonably skilled healthcare provider would provide under similar circumstances. When a doctor fails to diagnose a condition that another competent doctor would have caught, that could be considered medical malpractice.
Differences of Medical Malpractice vs. Negligence
While both negligence and medical malpractice involve someone failing to act with proper care, there are important differences between the two.
The Legal Standards
The most significant difference comes down to the legal standards involved. General negligence cases are based on whether a person acted reasonably under the circumstances. On the other hand, medical malpractice cases are more complex because they focus on whether a healthcare provider met the standard of care expected in the medical community. Negligence claims can involve anyone, whereas medical malpractice involves a healthcare professional.
Proving Medical Malpractice vs. Proving Negligence
Another key difference is the challenge of proving each case. While proving negligence might involve showing that someone was careless, proving medical malpractice is usually more complicated. You need to demonstrate that the healthcare provider’s actions directly led to harm and that these actions fell below the standard of care. This process often requires gathering medical records, consulting with experts, and understanding complex medical practices, which isn’t always necessary in general negligence cases.
Examples of Negligence vs Medical Malpractice
To help clarify the difference between malpractice and negligence, let’s look at some examples of each.
Negligence Examples
Negligence can happen in everyday situations. For instance, if a property owner doesn’t fix a broken staircase and someone trips and gets injured, that’s negligence. The property owner failed to maintain a safe environment, which led to the accident. Someone is speeding and hits another vehicle. That’s also negligence.
Examples of Medical Malpractice
Medical malpractice, on the other hand, is more specific to the healthcare setting. For example, if a surgeon operates on the wrong body part or a doctor prescribes the wrong medication, these are examples of malpractice. In these cases, the healthcare provider’s actions directly harmed the patient and didn’t meet the standard of care expected in their profession.
Legal Implications and Remedies
Understanding the differences between general negligence and medical malpractice is crucial when considering legal options. The legal consequences in each case can vary significantly.
In cases of general negligence, if you can prove the four elements, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries, lost wages, other related expenses, and pain and suffering. Your attorney may be able to negotiate a settlement with the other party’s insurance company in a few months, depending on the severity of your injuries. Many negligence cases are resolved before it’s necessary to file a lawsuit.
Medical malpractice cases often result in more complex legal battles due to the higher burden of proof and the need for expert testimony. There is almost always a legal defense team involved from the start. Compensation is similar to a negligence claim because you can recover money for lost wages, medical expenses, and pain and suffering. However, there might be a cap on your pain and suffering damages in a medical malpractice case. It all depends on the state and its medical malpractice laws.
Contact James Horne Law PA
If you or a loved one has suffered harm from negligence or medical malpractice, it’s important to contact a personal injury lawyer at James Horne Law PA. We can explain the difference between medical malpractice and negligence if you are unclear. Our attorneys will take the time to understand your situation’s full extent and severity and answer any questions you may have. Contact us to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation today to learn more.
James “Jay” Horne is an AV-Preeminent rated aggressive litigation attorney, who focuses his practice on medical malpractice, personal injury and family law matters. He has successfully represented clients from case inception through trial and appeals in state and federal court. Jay was born and raised on the Suncoast. He is married and proud father to a one year old son. In his free time, he enjoys traveling, golfing and distance running during the cool months.
Loading...